19Nov Press Statement from the ACP : Saturday Nov. 19th

Press Statement from the Association of Catholic Priests
Relating to Fr. Kevin Reynolds
Some months ago, in the aftermath of the Prime Time programme “Mission to Prey” one of our members, Kevin Reynolds, who was featured in that programme, came to us stating that he had been grievously libelled by the programme, that he was out of ministry and that his good name had been destroyed. He was looking for someone who would support his efforts to make right the injustice committed against him, and since no Church authority seemed willing to do so, he asked if we could help him. Some time previously a legal team had offered their services to us; but since we are a new association with very little money, they kindly agreed to work for us pro bono. So we were able to take on the defence of our colleague.
The rest of the story relating to the case of Kevin Reynolds is now in the public domain. But we as the Association of Catholic Priests would like to make clear some of the issues that we feel are raised by this case.
1. We think it is now clear, both from the way the Prime Time programme was produced and presented, and also from the results of the survey commissioned by the Iona Institute regarding attitudes of people towards priests, that there is a serious anti-Catholic and anti-priest bias among sections of the media, including some in the national broadcaster, and that this had led to a one-sided and unfair presentation of issues to do with Church and clergy in recent years.
2. We were disappointed by the way the statement of correction and apology was presented by RTE on television and radio after the completion of the case. Reading it quickly and with poor quality delivery seemed almost to imply a lack of sincerity about the content.
3. For many years now both priests and religious have been reluctant to engage in the public debate on issues related to the Church, because they did not want to add to the suffering of those who were genuinely abused, but also because they believed they would not get a fair hearing. They realised that very often the critics of the Church were allowed free rein by the presenters of programmes, whereas Church people were aggressively questioned and harassed about everything they said. So they remained silent. It is clear now that this silence has not helped, and has contributed to the unbalanced view of Church personnel shown up in the recent survey. This policy need to be revisited.
4. Church protocols dealing with the handling of allegations against priests are also seriously defective. If RTE can be criticised for not waiting a few weeks until such time as Kevin Reynolds had a chance to clear his name by taking the paternity test, as he had offered to do, surely the Church authorities should have been equally circumspect about any action that could be seen to imply guilt on his part.
5. We also support questions asked of RTE by the Irish Missionary Union:

• Why it decided to broadcast the false allegation when its reporter had been told that the alleged abuser would undergo a paternity test to prove his innocence?
• Why it chose to confront the priest in public view on church premises after Mass on a First Communion day?
• The legal advice it was given before it broadcast the false allegation?
• What means it used to try to verify the allegation made by the person who made the complaint in Africa?

Sean McDonagh 087 2367612. Brendan Hoban 0866065055. Tony Flannery 087 6814699 . P.J. Madden 087 2208882

7 Responses

  1. Martin

    I wonder will Patsy McGarry and friends be so vocal about this story.

  2. John Lyng

    RTE are to have a “review of editorial procedures” etc. I hope somebody there might ask the question: “Is it possible that what allowed/impelled us to go ahead with the programme, given the state of the evidence, was prejudice?”

  3. Kyle

    The Association of Catholic Priests may find their cheerleaders in the media a bit less helpful on this story. What the ACP will learn is so long as they are sticking the boot into the Church they will get plenty of coverage but the moment they question the media their friends in the press will turn very hostile. Glad the ACP appears to have woken up.

  4. Martin

    I have to say well done to the ACP in this instance. There are many good points raised here, especially this bit:
    >>>
    ” They realised that very often the critics of the Church were allowed free rein by the presenters of programmes, whereas Church people were aggressively questioned and harassed about everything they said. So they remained silent. It is clear now that this silence has not helped, and has contributed to the unbalanced view of Church personnel shown up in the recent survey.”
    <<< The mouse approach has not worked. What we need are strong bishops who will protect and serve the Church with apostolic zeal. We need strong, manly men, filled with courage, who are not afraid to speak the truth of Christ in the public square, come what may. The time for hand-wringing and sighing is over.

  5. Mangy Donkey

    Any chance of video/audio links to this story?

  6. Joe O'Leary

    Well said, Martin.

  7. James

    Is there any significance in the fact that this story continues to be classified and reported as an “entertainment” story in Google News? To me, it is anything but “entertainment” and the disclaimer to the effect that Google News stories are allocated to categories by machine is less than acceptable.